them

Oates based the Wendall family's decades of Detroit poverty partly on a real former student's letters, and the novel keeps reminding you of that origin — an author's note frames the whole book as reportage Oates felt unqualified to fully invent, and a metafictional 'Oates' periodically intrudes as narrator, unsettled by her own inability to impose novelistic shape on a life this genuinely chaotic. That friction is as much the book's real subject as the Wendalls' violence and poverty: whether literature can honestly represent lives that resist narrative order, or whether novelizing poverty is itself a kind of theft.

Loretta, Jules, and Maureen each chase a version of the American promise the novel systematically denies them — Loretta through men and remarriage, Jules through crime and reinvention, Maureen through sheer bodily withdrawal, going catatonic for the better part of a year after a violent, degrading encounter, then clawing back toward stability through the most conventional means imaginable, marriage to a professor. The 1967 Detroit riots arrive two-thirds through as historical eruption rather than climax, engulfing the family's world without redeeming or explaining it, Oates's blunt insistence that this violence doesn't resolve into meaning just because a novel is watching it happen.

Jules's arc, running from petty hustling to an affair with a wealthy, unstable woman to eventual involvement with radical politics, tracks the same energy that makes Loretta and Maureen's stories so grim — a hunger for reinvention that the city keeps punishing rather than rewarding — but Oates lets him survive on charm and luck in a way she denies the women, a quiet observation about whose recklessness gets treated as vitality and whose gets treated as ruin. Detroit itself, decaying and combusting across the decades the novel covers, functions less as backdrop than as a third parent, shaping the family's fates as decisively as any relative does.

Oates taught a student, referred to in interviews and the novel's own note as the real-life basis for Maureen, whose letters describing her family's Detroit hardships supplied much of the book's raw material; Oates has described feeling implicated by turning a living person's suffering into fiction, a discomfort the novel dramatizes directly rather than smoothing over. That unease is why the title works: the family are objects of documentary curiosity to the narrator even as she insists on their full subjectivity, a contradiction the book never fully resolves.

Oates, thirty-one when she won the National Book Award for this novel, writes squarely in the American naturalist tradition of Dreiser and Farrell — characters shaped by economic and urban forces largely beyond their control — but refuses that tradition's usual consolations of tragic grandeur. The prose stays flat and unsentimental through beatings, riots, and breakdowns alike, denying the reader the catharsis a more conventionally 'literary' treatment of the same material would supply.